Search found 734 matches

by Sly Southerner
Wed Jan 09, 2008 2:33 am
Forum: Rules Questions
Topic: about "stay her appetite"
Replies: 20
Views: 11226

Thanks Bandobras. That was not a boring post - it actuallly finally explained what the confusion was about which IMHO really wasnt very clear until now.
by Sly Southerner
Tue Jan 08, 2008 11:24 pm
Forum: Rules Questions
Topic: about "stay her appetite"
Replies: 20
Views: 11226

I think it would be better if you had stated your positions clearly at the start of the thread rather than playing leaving others to try to work out what you are saying. IMHO players such as Marcos seeking rules clarifications are only going to get more confused and turned off the game by this type ...
by Sly Southerner
Tue Jan 08, 2008 7:26 am
Forum: Rules Questions
Topic: about "stay her appetite"
Replies: 20
Views: 11226

This thread has become very confusing. Are you guys deliberately trying to muddy the waters or what?

The CoE ruling posted by Darksatin seems pretty conclusive to me.
by Sly Southerner
Sun Jan 06, 2008 10:22 am
Forum: Rules Questions
Topic: about "stay her appetite"
Replies: 20
Views: 11226

thats interesting, but not how I have played it on gccg in the past - i think even againt mark alfano.....

is that correct?
by Sly Southerner
Fri Jan 04, 2008 12:17 pm
Forum: Rules Questions
Topic: about "stay her appetite"
Replies: 20
Views: 11226

Only if it attacks I think.
by Sly Southerner
Thu Dec 27, 2007 10:10 am
Forum: Decks
Topic: Nazgul hazard strategy
Replies: 14
Views: 17202

Unfortynately its very difficult  to play a Nazgul Hazard Strategy. Its impossible against an experienced player and since you cant play them the theme is a bit wasted IMHO. I managed it once against a newbie who kept visiting Shadow-holds, but then I just felt guilty :) The usual way t do it i...
by Sly Southerner
Mon Oct 29, 2007 1:11 am
Forum: General
Topic: about erratas
Replies: 12
Views: 14131

Marc thats a good question. There are so many it would take a while to go through! Did you have any in mind?
by Sly Southerner
Sat Sep 22, 2007 1:39 pm
Forum: Decks
Topic: [Fallen Alatar] The Bounty of Framsburg
Replies: 22
Views: 22743

stone troll wrote:I'm sure that Zara knows that my comment was not intended to be a nasty criticism.
Mine neither.  :wink:
by Sly Southerner
Fri Sep 21, 2007 1:40 pm
Forum: Decks
Topic: [Fallen Alatar] The Bounty of Framsburg
Replies: 22
Views: 22743

Re: [Fallen Alatar] The Bounty of Framsburg

Zarathustra wrote:With this deck I took second place at US Nats 2004.  It's a bunch of fun, kinda cheezy, and very weird.
And illegal.  :oops:  :oops:
At least it didnt use the sneakin' trick.  :evil:
by Sly Southerner
Mon Sep 10, 2007 11:31 am
Forum: Optional Rules
Topic: [UEP, Failed] Blind/Ire cannot be used on Ring Tests
Replies: 42
Views: 44337

In the case of New Ringlord, while one can recycle the Ring Tests, it's the delay that is the key factor.  If I used Fallen Saruman's ability to pull Wizard's Test from the discard in order to test a Ring in the first place, I've just lost a turn. Have you found the deay is with playing the On...
by Sly Southerner
Mon Sep 10, 2007 11:29 am
Forum: Optional Rules
Topic: [UEP, Failed] Blind/Ire cannot be used on Ring Tests
Replies: 42
Views: 44337

Bandobras Took wrote:I've posted a workable New Ringlord deck in the decks section.  It's dunked twice in five games.
So what's the problem then?

Can you post a link?
by Sly Southerner
Sun Sep 09, 2007 3:21 am
Forum: Optional Rules
Topic: [UEP, Failed] Blind/Ire cannot be used on Ring Tests
Replies: 42
Views: 44337

It seems to me that even with this UEP Fallen Wizard Ringlord decks will still be unworkable because of the difficulty of winning with A New Ringlord. Would a UEP on A New Ringlord have more impact and be less controversial?
by Sly Southerner
Thu Sep 06, 2007 11:34 am
Forum: Optional Rules
Topic: about playing characters
Replies: 2
Views: 7850

Re: about playing characters

Also, how about going to a site to play a character during the site phase, in the same way we play allies, factions or items, that is by tapping the site and bringing a minor item as well? What do you think? This one seemed like a good idea to me when I first started playing. Basically iproves card...
by Sly Southerner
Thu Sep 06, 2007 11:29 am
Forum: Optional Rules
Topic: [UEP, Failed] Blind/Ire cannot be used on Ring Tests
Replies: 42
Views: 44337

Sounds interesting and I'm tempted to vote yes. I have never played with these cards however so I'd like to see some discussion before voting.
by Sly Southerner
Fri Aug 31, 2007 7:49 am
Forum: General
Topic: Hello. New guy here with some questions
Replies: 12
Views: 14613

Dont trade too much for the Dragon's Box, its only worth about $20. You should also have no trouble getting hold of Challenge decks they come up all the time.