MeCCG.net

Khamul Unleashed cannot be played in CvCC for the prowess effect when Khamul is the attacker. If he is the attacker he assigns strikes, which is arguably the more useful effect anyway. Anyway, it's not Khamul Unleashed which sucks, it's Khamul the Ringwraith and active Ringwraiths in general.  ...

Once you get used to it, GCCG is easy.

The trouble is in getting the item and ally points when there's lots of haven squatting. Faction will have to be played last turn, otherwise your opponent will just play Muster Disperses.

I don't think it's any different to be honest. With Orc-guard, if I key them to Shadow-land and my opponent changes the region type to wilderness, then bang, the creature fizzles, even if there is a Dark-domain in the site path. There's also the issue of detainment vs non-detainment and therefore ke...

I'm not sure on that Ben. The hazard player has to key a creature to something when it's declared. The conditions still have to be valid upon resolution and if upon resolution the keyed region or site non longer exists the creature card fizzles. A player playing a cave-drake can key the drake to a d...

But if the creature can be keyed to either region(s) or the site, then hazard player has to specify regions vs site.

But Ben, that's not true at all--the hazard player must pick a type to key his creature too. He can't pick "all types". Frodo Right. For a cave-drake, the hazard player must specify whether it's being keyed to a Ruins & Lairs or a double wildnerness. The same logic can be used for Frodo's original ...

Ranger agents combined with Inner Cunning, Nobody's Friend and Seek Without Success is also a good way to screw around with your opponent's companies.

Wouldn't it be easier if the follower wasn't removed inmediately from DI? Or if removing him affected GI? I find this quite counter-intuitive :( Yes it would, and it would make more sense if it was done this way too.  What you tend to find is playing cards that cause this to happen can actuall...

List updated to number 4 (up to end of May 2008).

Mikko, must have left his "I win" cards at home that day.  :)

I'd imagine the odds of that happening are staggeringly low however!

Now I see, that because Thrall of The Voice contains phrase: "Such a character may also be in your starting company." that may itself override MELE limitations for agents, reference to the agent is not necessary. I realise I didn't make this clear enough in previous posts. Next question - do you th...

You must reconcile this theory with text of Open To The Summons (why no "instead of ..."  there? Is agent played with OTTS extra character?). This is a good point, and hence why there's a topic currently open on the NetRep discussion board. I've already answered it: Which characters can be pla...

Orcs and trolls don't fit the new definitions/conditions because their rules in the WH insert aren't being overridden.  That is the whole point. If there weren't rules in the WH insert expressly prohibiting their play then I'd agree with you. Likewise WHCtK would then be able to bring into play...

Elves and Dwarves are also not allowed explicitly by the new definition. Why ever not?  Come now - they're not explicitly prohibited by the WH rules. Therefore they fall under the term character by default. The card isn't going to list everything already allowed. Anyway definition "one charact...